Can You Pass Our Reading Comprehension Quiz?

“Reading comprehension” might sound like it’s something that lives only in the world of the SAT, but it’s actually something that all of us use every day. You’re using it right now! And if your reading comprehension isn’t that great…well all kinds of misinterpretations and snafus can oShow More

“Reading comprehension” might sound like it’s something that lives only in the world of the SAT, but it’s actually something that all of us use every day. You’re using it right now! And if your reading comprehension isn’t that great…well all kinds of misinterpretations and snafus can occur.

So we’ve decided to help you gain a little bit of self-understanding and let you figure out just how good you are at understanding the written word. It might be a little more challenging than you expect, so get ready to work out that brain of yours just a little bit.

Yes, it’s time for you to go head to head with your friends (if you’re brave enough to share that is), and see which one of you is the best at words. Find out if you can understand everything from science writing to classic literature. Do you think you have what it takes? Let’s find out.

Show Less
NEXT QUESTION BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT
1

The passage is adapted from a speech delivered by Congresswoman Barbara Jordan of Texas on July 25, 1974. She was a member of the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives. In the passage, Jordan discusses how and when a United States president may be impeached, or charged with serious offenses while in office. Jordan’s speech was delivered in the context of impeachment hearings against then President Richard M. Nixon. "Today, I am an inquisitor. An hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that I feel right now. My faith in the Constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. And I am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the Constitution. “Who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?” “The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men.”* And that’s what we’re talking about. In other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust. It is wrong, I suggest, it is a misreading of the Constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the President should be removed from office. The Constitution doesn’t say that. The powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive. The division between the two branches of the legislature, the House and the Senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge—the framers of this Constitution were very astute. They did not make the accusers and the judges . . . the same person." How would you describe Jordan’s goals in this passage?

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Ready? Scroll down to answer
  • To discuss the Constitution
  • To set forth her role and the role of other house members in the proceedings
  • To convince others to impeach Nixon
  • To convince others not to impeach Nixon
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

What did you get? Let us know in the comments!